Going Up
prose by
cathleen
28 April 2002
30 comments
|
 |
Skein Home
Author's Works
View without comments
|
I stood up to clap.
I wasn't sure why.
Tears seeped down my cheeks in streams and my lips pressed tight together.
Everyone ignored me.
I was the only one standing.
Maybe the only one clapping.
I couldn't tell.
My eyes wouldn't leave the stage.
Maybe everyone else had gone home.
If everyone had gone home, I might have stayed there clapping until it became automatic and my arm muscles cramped around the elbow and I stumbled for the door unaware of the bruises blossoming on the meaty part of my palms.
But they didn't go home, and a rope ladder tumbled from a small hole in the ornate arched ceiling seventy feet away, unfolding to my seat.
No one noticed it.
I wiped my palms on the edge of my linen jacket and started climbing.
|
|
|
I'm sure it hasn't always been this way.
You're sure it isn't this way now, but let me quell your doubts.
It is this way.
Please don't ask why, because it will possibly be revealed by the end of this story, but more likely it won't.
In any case, it's a silly question.
Why anything?
Why, chicken, are you shaped just like that?
We like to say imperiously, "Miss Chicken is shaped thus-and-so because she is descended from a long line of beasts shaped thus-and-such and her genetic structure is the following" or "Miss Chicken is shaped thus-and-so because the farmers, who at the turn-of-the-century desired this-and-that, bred chickens shaped to meet these-and-those expectations" or "The market and the competing demands of feed companies and the consumer require thus-and-so." But none of these answer our question, not even about the shape of chickens.
[1]
After we exhaust them, and bruise our hands applauding ourselves, we find that the only answer to the child who persists is to ask her in return:
[2] |
|
|
[ 1 ] eppy:
Heeheehee. Very nice. |
|
[ 2 ] samira:
Cathy, this paragraph is really great--it is a nice balance of silly aproach to serious questions, without being cutesy. Very nice. I think what I like best is that you don't realize that serious questions are involved until you get to the next line. |
| Add comment |
|
|
Why are you, darling, shaped just like that?
|
|
|
eppy:
Ooh, super-extra-nice. I love it when a joke becomes a serious reference--works really well. |
|
alecia:
I like the effect of the pause, darling, pause in the middle of this sentence. Slows it down just enough to make the question both a self-questioning and a question posed to the reader. |
| Add comment |
|
|
This question, when applied to the shape of an entire life built from indecipherable events, becomes so empty and imponderable that we leave it for the dead to think about in their disintegrating sleep or else we write short stories that take us up into the ceilings of old theaters.
|
|
|
eppy:
Wow, nice. Uh, I'm sure my comments will become more profound soonish... |
|
alecia:
I think I want a comma or an emdash between "sleep" and "else." It's a bit of a mouthful else-wise... 'course, it's a lovely mouthful. The dream-quality of the first few paragraphs and "leav[ing] it for the dead" to think / dream about mesh nicely. |
| Add comment |
|
|
Like I said, it probably has not always been like this.
I haven't spent all my life taking hold of things.
My brother and I lost our new, black and yellow kite when I let go of the string, and I was inconsolable even as my father walked to every house in the neighborhood, a mile or two easily, asking if they had seen our kite coming down to roost in their trees.
[3] [4]
I wouldn't talk.
At another point, as my mother strapped my brother into his tiny carseat, I stared open-mouthed as our new helium balloons floated shinily up to join the clouds.
That was the first time I looked directly into the sun, but I didn't even stop to notice how it looked.
I couldn't stop to notice or to speak or to cry.
[5]
These are much closer approximations of the vast majority of my life -- notable are the silences, and the repeated slipping away into air.
|
|
|
[ 3 ] eppy:
Mmm, maybe a little too easy here. (Look, profundity.) I do like the short sentence that follows. |
|
[ 4 ] alecia:
I don't know if I agree with Mike and Samira here. Yes, the sentence does draw attention to itself. At the same time, the example you've picked, that of a childhood kite, is not particularly heavy or profound... which takes it almost to paradox-level, in that it makes you wonder "does this incident, small as it is, count?" Perhaps I'm just playing devil's advocate. I am not sure of this comment. |
|
[ 5 ] eppy:
I'm annoyed but touched by those last two sentences, which is probably good. Nevertheless, in the midst of all that realizm I found myself wondering, "Does the narrator really remember the first time they looked into the sun?" Maybe something even more surrealistic, echoing back on the first paragraph? |
|
samira:
I generally agree with Mike's comments here. I think the idea, or the idea which I get out of it (the shock of loss) is good, but the change of tone from the silly to the almost overly senitmental doesn't work so well. It does feel easy, and I am not sure what suggest you do about that. But there has to be a way to make it work because I really like the way that it feeds into the first line of the next paragraph. |
| Add comment |
|
|
This time it was me slipping away.
My stealth action, and I started to know why the kite and balloons had wanted it so badly.
But more than that, I was climbing a very long ladder into a realm I had feared since I was six.
I only made it to the top of the big monkey bars twice, while other children swung from the top bars easily, gibing the teachers, and the popular girls claimed bars that the others were not allowed to touch.
[6]
Too much like monkeys.
I preferred to lope along the ground, enjoying my evolved status, using it to make patterns with stones and peeled sticks and to talk to trees on windy days.
[7] [8] [9]
In the theater, the wind was not blowing, only a light shift of air from the ventilator, but this was enough to make me grip the rungs and notice my bruises for the first time.
[10] |
|
|
[ 6 ] eppy:
"Gibing"? |
|
[ 7 ] eppy:
Eh, a little too unselfconsciously self-aggrandizing. |
|
[ 8 ] samira:
Mike is right, but I think it is only a matter of phrasing. Can you make it clear that it is a preferance, but also a fear (even a weakness?) |
|
[ 9 ] cgroom:
Hmmm... I see where the others are coming from on their comments, but I disagree. I think it's OK for the narrator to set herself apart here because it's funny, given the previous sentence about monkeys. What makes it jarring is that I think this is the only place the narrator takes pride in her being apart, and it's a bit jarring. |
|
[ 10 ] alecia:
I like the repetition of the wind-details here. It adds a nice rhythm & parallelism. |
| Add comment |
|
|
Where is this story going, you might wonder.
It is going up.
But here is some plot, although it will be a tad sketchy, I fear.
It starts with fear.
[11]
As I reached the pit in the ceiling I suddenly lost my nerve.
I felt it going, tried to get it back, tried to reestablish the bond that had grown between my self and my hands, to make everything one trusted unit in one long upward motion, but I kept returning to the playground and the day that Jamie Martineau broke her wrist.
I didn't see her fall, but I heard the story and built the image from collective memory, in all its gory lack of detail.
[12]
The red-streaked tears, the loud crack, the fast motion, the open-mouthed silent lack of pain.
It dug a rut into my brain.
I looked down.
|
|
|
[ 11 ] eppy:
Initial injection of self-awareness good, but echoing of "fear" rings falsely. |
|
[ 12 ] eppy:
No need to say "gory lack of detail"--just describe it flatly, I think, given that the following description is so good. |
|
alecia:
Complete agreement wiith Mike's comments here. You don't need to call attention to the (possibly imperfect, but the reader has no way of knowing) narration of the story, because it feels very descriptive and complete in the details you give us. |
| Add comment |
|
|
One person looked back up at me.
Eye contact from seventy feet away?
It held me for a second, unbreakable.
Had he been watching the whole time?
Was he the only other person there?
He watched me through his clunky glasses as if I was his helium balloon.
[13]
Having never lost something by dropping it, I didn't know how to look at him, so I watched myself through his eyes instead.
From the seats below I saw a tiny head and shoulders disappear into the hole and then flop one leg and the other.
[14] |
|
|
[ 13 ] cgroom:
Sweet parrallism. |
|
[ 14 ] alecia:
As Chuck points out, the echoes of yourself here are so effective. I love.
It feels like this sentence breaks rhythm in the middle, though... might you consider a pause instead of "and then"? Maybe something that mirrors the floppy pauses in the action, i.e. "From the seats below I saw a tiny head and shoulders disappear into the hole, then flop one leg, then the other." Oh, and the verb "flop" is awesome. Very visual. |
|
eppy:
Really good last sentence. But "Having never lost something by dropping it" throws me a bit--really? Maybe "Having never seen the effects of gravity but only reconstructed it from secondhand reports..." |
| Add comment |
|
|
It smelled like hot, close dust in there, but he didn't know that.
He didn't see the funny peaked room with the one grilled and cobwebbed window high up.
But I did.
Nor did he see the one object in the room: a slender volume entitled Why the Animals are Shaped as They Are by God.
Chapter III: "The Chicken." I opened the book.
I felt a tug on the rope.
My hands ached too much to turn the pages.
The rope again.
I looked down and met his eyes immediately.
He was on his way up.
I began to clap for him but found my wrist too full of pain.
I looked up for an explanation for the pain and found the sun burning its way through the grilled window.
I looked at it for the second time, made eye contact with it, and was held there.
Tears began streaming down my face.
[15]
A lost kite fluttered at the window's edge.
I dropped the book and it fell seventy feet.
|
|
|
[ 15 ] alecia:
I like the way you end it by bringing all the details together and letting them rest without much explanation. I think you can cut this "Tears began streaming..." sentence, though. It's clear from earlier paragraphs that the kite was meaningful, but the tears here interrupt the flow for me. They draw attention away from the other images and nudge this piece towards overt sentiment, which doesn't seem like what you want. |
|
eppy:
The last sentence, again, is so good, but the one before that is, to me anyway, really cheesy. I think of "The Red Balloon," you know. |
|
samira:
I might like a bit more conclusion--what is the significance of the other person? And am I supposed to have a sense as to whether the ablity to notice the sun is positive or negative? The inablity to notice seemed negative, but now that you can notice, or do notice, what brings that revelation is pain. Now, if the answer is that it is a mixed blessing or that you want it ambiguous, that is perfect, but I wanted to ask. |
|
cgroom:
Earlier, you said you felt fear, but here I feel sorrow and a vague cosmic oppression. |
| Add comment |
|
|
|
|
j_moody:
y'know, this is kinda cool. I would keep fiddling with it. I think you're very close on the trail of something liminal and profound. |
|
eppy:
Yeah, good stuff. All the echoing works really well, and the injections of self-awareness are generally tasteful and revealing. Contra that, though, I wouldn't mind seeing a tad more plot. |
|
cgroom:
This is wonderful! It's really hard to write surreallity that is interesting and meaningful, but you pull it off. |
|
cgroom:
I hope you continue with this work -- either to make others, or to revise this one. It's good, but I feel it could be even more compact. At the start it feels like it's going to talk about responding to theatre, but towards the middle and end it's more of a mataphysical wandering through fear and impressions that solidify into meaning. |
|
alecia:
This is so nice. I like the wanderings-- how you start with several disparate images, climb with them, and juxtapose the echoes at the end. I didn't really expect this piece to come back together neatly, or drop back to earth with the drop of the book, so I find it very satisfying to finish-- and then return to the beginning to figure out exactly how it fits together. :) |
| Add comment |
|
|
Content © copyright 2002 by Cathleen Rebecca Muller. All rights reserved.