Marina Carr's "The Mai"

prose by patsy
18 October 2001
16 comments

Skein Home
Author's Works
View without comments
 

[picture of Marina Carr beside quote in original]
 

 
Add comment

"I think of theater as magic, as opposed to theater as prose. If a play moves you beyond the ordinary, if it takes you somewhere, then I think that's magic, that indescribable ingredient that every writer prays for" (Hartigan C3).
 

 
Add comment

Marina Carr's play The Mai certainly answered the prayers of hercritics, who consistently acclaim this new playwright's magical talent. [1] [2] At itsworld premiereat the 1994 Dublin Theatre Festival, it earned the highest honors,and Carr continues to win awards for her work. Irish scholar Declan Kiberdcompared herwork to that of J. M. Synge (King 45), and many dub Carr the "femaleFriel" (McNulty 104). While the work of great Irish playwrights like BrianFriel nurture Marina Carr's talent, her narrative articulates femalevoices traditionally reverted to the Irish landscape. [3] [4] Her use of an Irishrural landscape is both a testament to her Irish identity, and her innovativeproject: to set the stage for female expression. [5]
 

 

[ 1 ] cgroom: This first sentence is ambiguous, because it's not a given what her critics are like. If the critics don't like her, then saying that the play answers their prayers could be read as a snide way of saying "it sucks."

[ 2 ] jlewis: Well, Chuck, the next clause does say that they "consistently acclaim" her. Although I'm not sure about "magical talent" -- it's kind of an awkward phrase and I think the "answered the prayers" part ties it in enough with the starting quote.

[ 3 ] jlewis: I'm having trouble parsing this. Maybe "reverted" is the wrong word? Female voices reverted to the Irish landscape? Help?

[ 4 ] samira: Do you mean relegated?

[ 5 ] samira: How? Can you give an example of a place in which she does a stunning job of bringing forth female voices?

Add comment

Unlike her predecessors, and similar to her contemporaries, Carr's writing seemsto be moving away from the convention of placing her characters in an Irishsocial-political context. W.B. Yeats' work is one example of how females are, attimes, romanticized as symbols of the Irish nation. In Carr's play The Mai, thepredominantly female cast spans over four generations, each individual characterembodying a different stage ofwomanhood. Indeed, Carr's character development inThe Mai has less to do with Ireland than with Greek tragedy; Carr says that whilewriting this particularplay, she moved towards a "Greek idea of destiny and fateand little escape"(Clarity, C23). The characters may make illusions to socialIrish settings, aswhen they recall scenes in the pub and dances in the village,but most of the action takes place in a house The Mai built on a hill, isolatedfrom thevillagers. [6] What makes Carr's work unique is her deviation from usingIreland asa backdrop for cultural issues, and instead using Ireland'scountryside toillustrate the emotional topography of her female characters.
 

 

[ 6 ] cgroom: Illusions are allusions?

cgroom: There's a paragraph missing before this; you close the previous paragraph talking about how she fills the Irish landscape and the role of women, but you don't show that. A brief discussion of the play and its tensions are in order before this paragraph, which is a commentary on her sources and intentions.

jlewis: I agree with Chuck -- you talk a lot about interpretations and criticisms of the play, but you don't, per se, talk about the content of the play at all. Some specifics about it and the way those specifics tie in to your interpretive points would be nice.

samira: You also assume that your reader knows a good bit aabout conventions of Irish theater. It does not do much good to contrast her work to standards with which the reader is not familiar. Which means that unless a) they are going to be familiar with plays that "us[e] Ireland's countryside to illustrate the emotional topography of...female characters" b) you have time/space to really discuss the standard tradition so that people understand how remarkable and amazing her deviations are, you need to show her as remarkable and innovative without contrasting her to other playwrights. So you might say, "What makes Carr's work unique is...." and then instead of contrasting it, talk about some of the great things that her techinque reveals about the Irish, female tradition.

Add comment

In an interview regarding her play Portia Coughlan, Carr says that the charactersshe creates are outsiders: "In a lot of plays, the women are ciphers ... I try togive the man articulation to express their depths and their contradictions"(Hartigan C3).The result is the disclosure of women in their entirety, ratherthan an exercise in idolatry. In The Mai, one sees Grandma Fraochlán, (thematriarch of crassness,) gleefully recount a dream in which she sees her lovedones in heaventhrough a glass ceiling while she and Satan "gets an like a housean fire" (Carr20). This and other language of the play irked some theater-goersin Ireland, however most critics hailed it (Clarity C23). Regardless if Carrstirs the waters with audiences, she succeeds in demystifying the rurallandscape, and giving voice to those "who are too often silenced" (Hartigan C3).Rural Ireland then becomes an ideal context for this play, if not for thepurposes of culturalrenewal, then for the retrieval of the self.
 

 

cgroom: I get lost in the second half of this paragraph. You discuss crassness as a tool, but then jump to saying that Carr demystifies the rural landscape; as a reader, I don't have any idea how she treats the rural landscape. Perhaps insert a transistion sentence describing Carr's treatment of the landscape in her play, then jump back into the flow of analysis.

samira: If you are going to have a paragraph that covers two such divergent ideas in one paragraph, you need a topic sentence that makes it clear that you are covering two topics aand that establishes a connection between them.

Add comment

Marina Carr's early plays--which had their first run in small theaters--were absurdist andbizarre, according to James F. Clarity of the New York Times. These, he says,were plays from what Carr calls her "Becket tphase" (C23). [7] What evolved in thelast few years is her own voice, whose foundation is in a rich tradition, andwhose objective is the greatest compliment to her influences. The Irish Repertory of Chicago produced "The Mai," Carr'sfifth play, in April 2000, thusmaking its second appearance inthe United States. What Americans will see is theepitome of Carr's voice-"dark,mythic, poetic even in its profanity-that marks itas the work of a major new dramatist" (McNulty 104). If a play's mission is tomove audiences beyond the ordinary, Carr's stage certainly resides in an extra-ordinaryrealm. Her muses, ranging in age from daughter to great-grandmother, offer a sentimentall their own. [8]
 

 

[ 7 ] samira: Since you haven't talked about her Beckett phase, do you really want to bring it up in the concluding paragraph? Is it relavant to you message or could you begin by saying, "In the last few years, Carr has come into her own as a powerful and yada yada voice."

[ 8 ] cgroom: This would be a much better ending if you introduced these two muses, the daughter and great-grandmother, earlier in this piece.

samira: I agree with Chuck, particularly in as much as you could show how she uses those muses in this specific play. Unfortuantely, I am having a hard time parsing the sentence: I am guessing that you are refering to her female characters as muses, but since you have not refered to those women as muses, despite your reference to the Greeks, I got stuck on the word, trying to relate it to her external inspirations. Also, you have not done much to show thheir sentimentallity, and so the sentence, which should be summing up everything you haave said so far, doesn't really say anything.

Add comment
 

cgroom: While this is a good review, I'm afraid that I'm left with too many "show me, don't tell me" moments. I need to see examples of what you're talking about when you discuss Carr's treatment of the landscape, characters, and the reaction of various audiences. Fortunately, I think one more paragraph and a few choice sentences may be all that's needed.

samira: II think that you are caught between writing a critical anaylsis of the play and writing a review. If you want to write a critical analysis, you need to provide more background about the plays with which you are contrasting "The Mai"and add some more oof your oown critical thought. If you are writing a review, you need to help me decide whether orr not I actually want to see/read the play, which means that I need to know a bit more about the plot and what is or isn't engaging about it. Either way, I simply need to hear more about the play. You need to discuss it and while you cabn include quotes from other critics, you need to leave me feeling that you have added insight to the discussion.

Add comment

[ Back to top ] [ Author's Works ] [ Skein home ]